The Impact of Peer Feedback on Moroccan EFL University Students’ Writing Errors
The Case of Subject-Verb Agreement, Fragment and Run-On Sentences
Mots-clés :
peer feedback, EFL university students, writing errors, subject-verb agreement, fragment, run-onRésumé
This study investigates the impact of peer feedback on Moroccan EFL University students' writing proficiency. The study focuses mainly on examining students’ errors at the level of their written complex sentences, seeking to examine the effectiveness of structured peer feedback in reducing writing errors. To do so, 80 semester two students at Ibn Tofail University have been divided into two groups: the experimental and control groups. The difference between the experimental and control groups’ errors has been corroborated by quantitative measurements using statistical tests, namely the independent t-test and the paired t-test to analyse students' written errors before and after receiving the treatment (peer feedback). The results demonstrate that peer feedback has helped to reduce students' written complex sentence errors, namely subject verb-agreement, fragment and run-on leading to improving their knowledge of English complex sentence structure rules. The findings of this study provide practical implications for researchers, syllabus designers, and language teachers to integrate peer feedback into language instruction to reduce such errors and develop Moroccan EFL university students’ writing proficiency.
Téléchargements
Références
Abu-Rabia, S. (1997). The influence of attitudes and culture on language learning and literacy: The case of Jewish and Arab students in Israel. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 10(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908319709525297
Celce-Murcia, M., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Williams, H. A. (1983). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher's course (p. 854). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2010). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and instruction, 20(4), 328-338.
El Kadiri, M. (2020). The effects of peer feedback on the syntactic complexity of Moroccan EFL university students' writing. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 7(2), 87-101.
Elkoubaiti, S., & Elouadgani, M. (2021). Exploring peer feedback in Moroccan secondary school EFL classrooms: Implications for writing instruction. Moroccan Journal of English Studies, 8(2), 56-70.
Farrah, M. (2012). 4 The impact of peer feedback on improving the writing skills among Hebron University students.
Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Routledge.
Ghaicha, A., & Ait Taleb, A. (2016). Investigating the effectiveness of peer reviewing in a Moroccan University EFL writing Class. Higher Education of Social Science, 11(5), 1-12.
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2019). Contexts and issues in feedback on L2 writing. Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues, 1-22.
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (Eds.). (2019). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, P. (2000). Learning from feedback on assessment, in A. Booth and P. Hyland (eds) The practice of university history teaching Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Li, H., & Vuono, A. (2019). The role of peer feedback in EFL writing instruction: A systematic review. Language Teaching Research, 23(1), 1-20.
Saigh, K., & Schmitt, N. (2012). Grammar instruction: What teachers say they teach and what students want to learn. TESOL Quarterly, 46(1), 163-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.4
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of second language writing, 14(3), 153-173.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (Vol. 1). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Téléchargements
-
Download PDF (Anglais)
Résumé Views: 0,
Download PDF (Anglais): 0
Publiée
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Copyright International Journal of Innovative Scientific Research 2026

Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.












