Exploring the Zenana: Ismat Chughtai and the Vision of Feminist Utopia
Keywords:
Feminist Utopia, Sex, Chughtai, Zenana, Philosophy, RealismAbstract
The conventional interpretation of a zenana often symbolizes male dominance over women. However, Ismat Chughtai's work, particularly her story "Lihaaf," challenges this prevailing notion and offers a different perspective. Chughtai seeks to disrupt the association of a zenana with male control and aims to provide it with a transformed meaning. While conventional views perceive a zenana as a space designed to isolate women from the outside world, Chughtai, in "Lihaaf," employs it as a microcosm that represents her own reality. This paper aims to demonstrate how Chughtai subverts the gendered nature of this space and establishes a feminist utopia within it. It explores the notion that patriarchy's inherent disparities unintentionally create opportunities for agency and generate spaces for a feminist utopia to emerge.
Downloads
References
Chughtai, I. et al. (1972). The quilt. Mahfil, 8(2/3), 195–202.
Batra, K. (2010). The home, the veil and the world: Reading Ismat Chughtai towards A “progressive” history of the Indian women’s movement. Feminist Review, 95(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2009.57
Rae, G. (2020). Poststructuralist Agency. Edinburgh University Press.
Chughtai, I. (2014). Autobiographical fragments excerpted from Ismat Chughtai’s autobiography Kaghazi Hai Pairahan. Translational Medicine.
Patel, G. (2001). Marking the quilt: Veil, harem/home, and the subversion of colonial civility. Colby Quarterly, 174–188. English.
Gopal, P. (2005). Habitations of Womanhood. Gopal, Priyamvada. Literary radicalism in India. Routledge, Pp. 66–88.
Khanna, T. (2020). Gender, self-representation and sexualized spaces: A reading of Ismat Chughtai’s Lihaaf impact. International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature.
Priyadarshini, A. (2021). Lihaaf, A story of the story. Sage Publication.
Indira, M. (2007). ‘There Is No Sin in Our Love’: Homoerotic desire in the stories of two Muslim women writers. University of Tulsa.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
De Beauvoir, S. (1984). The second sex H. M. Parshley & Penguin (Translated by).
Eagleton, M. (Ed.). (2003). A concise companion to feminist theory. Oxford.
Firestone, S. (1970). The dialectic of sex: The case of feminist revolution. Bantam Press.
Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality, 1: An introduction. Vintage; Reissue edition.
Handler, L.. (1995a). In the fraternal sisterhood: Sororities as gender strategy. Gender and Society, 9(2), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124395009002006
Handler, L. (1995b). Gender and Society. In The Fraternal Sisterhood, 9(2, April), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124395009002006
Hossain, R. S. (1905). Sultana’s dream. The essential Rokeya: Selected works of Rokeya Sakhawat Hossain. (2013) (pp. 159–168). Brill.
Hutt, M., & James. (1993). The short story in Nepali Himalayan voices.
Jain, J. (2011). Indigenous roots of feminism: Culture, subjectivity and agency. SAGE.
Jussawalla, F. (2000). To veil or not to veil: Muslim women writers speak theirRights.
Mookerjea-Leonard, D. (2017). Futuristic Technologies and Purdah in the Feminist Utopia: Rokeya S. Hossain’s “Sultana’s dream.” Feminist Review, 116(1), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-017-0067-6
Downloads
-
Download PDF
Abstract Views: 148, 
Download PDF: 30
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Innovative Scientific Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
